Elon’s Tweet on below – 7 million views almost as of 10/29 at 12:55 pm
A new analysis from @theMRC finds that broadcast evening news coverage of the 2024 presidential race has been the most lopsided in history.https://t.co/QqtjHX8nOA
— Essential Network (@EssentialTVonX) October 29, 2024
STUDY: TV NEWS HITS NEW BIAS HIGH – 78% POSITIVE KAMALA VS 85% NEGATIVE TRUMP Major networks ABC, CBS, and NBC have delivered most unbalanced election coverage in history, Media Research Center finds. Networks spent 31% of Trump coverage on controversies while dedicating only 5% of Kamala coverage to critical topics. The Study analyzed over 600 segments since July. The Coverage gap exceeds both 2016 and 2020 elections, as networks gave twice as much airtime to Trump after September debate – mostly negative. Findings come as Gallup shows public trust in media hits new low, with 36% having “no trust at all.” Source: Media Research Center Study, Fox
- Analysis shows that former President Donald Trump received 85% negative media coverage in recent months, contrasting sharply with 78% positive coverage for Vice President Kamala Harris.
- The data focuses on coverage from major TV networks, including ABC, CBS, and NBC, revealing a significant bias in reporting styles.
- Trump’s media portrayal has predominantly highlighted criminal cases, painting him as highly controversial, with limited coverage on policy stances.
- In contrast, coverage of Kamala Harris has often been favorable, with frequent emphasis on her role as the first female and minority Vice President.
- Analysis indicates that even Trump’s policy initiatives or speeches are often framed within a negative context, rarely allowing for favorable interpretations.
- Harris’s media focus often highlights her work in gender and minority empowerment, with comparatively minimal scrutiny of her policies or controversies.
- Reports frequently portray Trump’s supporters as divisive or extremist, creating a narrative of tension around his base.
- Coverage of Trump’s legal challenges takes center stage, with less mention of his influence on policy or his base’s continued support.
- Harris is frequently presented as a historic figure, with many reports emphasizing her breaking of racial and gender barriers.
- Despite Harris’s lower approval ratings, positive media coverage focuses on her symbolic role rather than public criticisms of her performance.
- The networks have repeatedly highlighted Trump’s past controversies, especially around January 6th, as opposed to recent policy statements or campaign plans.
- Stories regarding Harris largely avoid discussing her polling numbers, with emphasis instead on her speeches and public engagements.
- Trump’s coverage often includes commentary on possible dangers if he were to regain office, rarely discussing his policy plans if elected.
- Harris’s achievements are frequently emphasized as part of a larger narrative on diversity and inclusion, which the networks repeatedly highlight.
- Negative portrayals of Trump are said to correlate with networks’ focus on the risks he allegedly poses to democracy.
- The article suggests that the favorable coverage of Harris could be boosting her public perception, even if her polling numbers remain low.
- Trump’s coverage often alludes to fears within the GOP about his electability, painting a picture of internal party strife.
- Harris’s image benefits from frequent positive mentions of her involvement in Biden administration initiatives, regardless of public reception.
- This disparity in coverage may shape public opinion by reinforcing narratives of Trump’s legal issues and Harris’s achievements.
- Critics argue this coverage split might influence voter opinions, skewing public perception before the 2024 election campaign.
MRC’s Rich Noyes crunched all the numbers and found the most slanted TV news campaign in history. ABC, CBS, and NBC have never tried harder to sound like an ongoing Democrat advertisement, both anti-Trump and pro-Harris. See Newsbusters article – click here
Something fishy is going on with the social media companies and search engines tipping news in favor of Kamala Harris.
A new audit reveals a disturbing bias in Google and YouTube search results.
When users search for negative news about Kamala Harris, they’re met with… pic.twitter.com/vz54Kj2nZf
— The Vigilant Fox 🦊 (@VigilantFox) July 29, 2024
Something fishy is going on with the social media companies and search engines tipping news in favor of Kamala Harris. A new audit reveals a disturbing bias in Google and YouTube search results. When users search for negative news about Kamala Harris, they’re met with overwhelmingly positive or neutral content. For example, on Google, searching for “Kamala Harris negative news July 2024” predominantly returns positive articles. Similarly, on YouTube, searches for “Kamala Harris negative videos July 2024” show supportive content. If the fix is not in at the ballot booth, it certainly seems to be online.
Stolen Liberties & Echoes of Freedom. 2nd American Revolution Begins – A short story by CK Sheldon, for Whatfinger News….
Chapter Links
Chapter 1 page 1
Chapter 1 Page 2
Chapter 2
Chapter 3
Chapter 4
Add comment