Joe Rogan with MIKE BENZ: “Dr. Jay Bhattacharya was just named director of the NIH. That’s one of the most inspiring stories. He was kicked off of Twitter, he was a premier scientist at Stanford, he was labeled a fringe epidemiologist by Fauci and company and now he just achieved the most premiere role in all of medicine. It’s like putting Bobby Kennedy as head of HHS. This is what needs to happen with the censorship space. It has to go through a gauntlet. The way to restore faith in an institution is to make it do a naked lap, and then it can return and get back into the good graces. I am not anti-institution, I am not anti-American Empire, but the empire has to serve the homeland. It has to go through this period of penitence.”
🚨MIKE BENZ: “Dr. Jay Bhattacharya was just named director of the NIH. That’s one of the most inspiring stories. He was kicked off of Twitter, he was a premier scientist at Stanford, he was labeled a fringe epidemiologist by Fauci and company and now he just achieved the most… pic.twitter.com/C8nAh4GeBx
— Autism Capital 🧩 (@AutismCapital) December 4, 2024
Listen to the convo on the original article at American Thinker….
Briefing Doc: Dr. Jay Bhattacharya and the Future of the NIH
Source: “Dr. Jay Bhattacharya Will Transform the NIH” by Susan Quinn, American Thinker, December 4, 2024 – Read original article or see details below with clips on how much this man will be helping America and Trump…
Main Themes:
- Criticism of the NIH’s handling of the COVID-19 pandemic: The article argues that the NIH, under the leadership of Anthony Fauci and Francis Collins, abandoned evidence-based medicine and prioritized political agendas over scientific integrity.
- Praise for Dr. Bhattacharya’s qualifications and stance on COVID-19: The author hails Dr. Bhattacharya as a highly qualified and respected scientist who has been unfairly maligned for his dissenting views on COVID-19 mitigation strategies, particularly his co-authorship of the Great Barrington Declaration.
- Hopes for Dr. Bhattacharya’s potential leadership at the NIH: The article outlines several changes the author hopes Dr. Bhattacharya will implement if appointed as NIH director, including a renewed focus on innovation, scientific rigor, transparency, and rebuilding public trust.
Key Facts and Ideas:
- The Great Barrington Declaration: This document, co-authored by Dr. Bhattacharya, advocated for a “focused protection” approach to COVID-19, prioritizing the protection of vulnerable populations while allowing others to build immunity through infection. It drew sharp criticism from many public health officials, including Francis Collins, who called it “fringe” and “dangerous.”
- Allegations of bias and suppression of dissent: The article suggests that the NIH, under previous leadership, suppressed dissenting scientific viewpoints and that Dr. Bhattacharya was unfairly targeted for his views.
- Concerns about the direction of medical research: The article highlights concerns about the slowing pace of pharmaceutical innovation and the focus on “me-too research” incentivized by current evaluation systems. It argues that the NIH should prioritize groundbreaking research over incremental advancements.
- Distrust in the public health system: The article claims that the NIH’s actions during the pandemic have eroded public trust in medical institutions and that Dr. Bhattacharya’s leadership could help restore this trust.
Dr Jay Bhattacharya, Trump’s NIH Director pick, talks about science becoming a religion with people like Fauci as head priest.
Dr Jay Bhattacharya, Trump’s NIH Director pick, talks about science becoming a religion with people like Fauci as head priest. pic.twitter.com/FGL807me6I
— David Gornoski (@DavidGornoski) November 27, 2024
Important Quotes:
- On the Great Barrington Declaration: “’This is a fringe component of epidemiology,’ Collins told The Washington Post shortly after the document was released. ‘This is not mainstream science. It’s dangerous. It fits into the political views of certain parts of our confused political establishment.’”
- On Dr. Bhattacharya’s qualifications: “As you can tell, the man is no lightweight in his field.”
- On the impact of COVID-19 policies: “‘In the United States we abandoned evidence-based medicine during the pandemic. Therefore, there’s now enormous distrust, I think, both in medicine and in public health. NIH has an important role to restore the integrity in medical research and public health research,’ Kulldorff says.”
- Hopes for Dr. Bhattacharya’s leadership: “Dr. Bhattacharya’s top charge at the NIH will be returning the agency to its original mission of funding innovation rather than political science masquerading as real science.”
Dr Fauci will be very mad if you retweet this video of him and the Covid HOAX getting exposed
Don’t retweet this 1 minute clip of Tucker Carlson and Trump’s new NIH Director Jay Bhattacharya
Dr Fauci will be very mad if you retweet this video of him and the Covid HOAX getting exposed
LET’S GO 👏 pic.twitter.com/Sjun8r2f3U
— Marjorie Taylor Greene Press Release (Parody) (@MTGrepp) November 27, 2024
Overall, the article presents a highly favorable view of Dr. Bhattacharya and his potential leadership at the NIH. It frames him as a champion of scientific integrity and innovation who can restore public trust in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic.
Note: It’s crucial to remember that this article expresses a specific viewpoint. Further research and consideration of alternative perspectives are necessary to form a balanced understanding of Dr. Bhattacharya’s qualifications and potential impact on the NIH.
The Other Side….. An Attack piece of course… MSNBC aired a smear against RFK Jr. and Dr. Jay Bhattacharya, showing just how scared Big Pharma must be.
MSNBC aired a smear against RFK Jr. and Dr. Jay Bhattacharya, showing just how scared Big Pharma must be. pic.twitter.com/fOitzCOtfT
— Camus (@newstart_2024) December 1, 2024
More on topic
My favorite prof dr jay Bhattacharya just got appointed as the director of national institute of health. He was heavily censored in the media including social media. He was called fringe epidemiologist. Tomorrow illeberal liberal media including the newspapers of record like nytimes will be in full emotional melt down including the followers of these media. “””””””””” **Biography of Dr. Jay Bhattacharya:** Dr. Jay Bhattacharya is a professor of medicine at Stanford University, an economist, and a public health policy expert. He holds both an MD and a PhD in economics from Stanford and serves as the director of Stanford’s Center for Demography and Economics of Health and Aging. **Research Accomplishments:** – Bhattacharya’s research primarily focuses on the health and well-being of vulnerable populations, particularly the elderly, examining the impact of government health programs, biomedical innovations, and economic factors on health outcomes. –
He has an extensive publication record, with over 135 articles in peer-reviewed journals, covering medicine, economics, and public health. His work includes significant studies on the epidemiology of diseases like COVID-19, the implications of population aging, and evaluations of health policy responses. **Controversial Position on COVID-19 and Censorship:** – Dr. Bhattacharya was a vocal critic of widespread lockdowns during the COVID-19 pandemic, arguing that the societal and economic costs were disproportionately high compared to the benefits, especially for low-risk populations. His views made him a controversial figure, and he was heavily censored during the COVID era, with his social media presence and media coverage being limited or suppressed. This included being placed on a Twitter “Trends blacklist” and facing significant media backlash. **The “Fringe Epidemiologist” Incident:** –
In October 2020, shortly after the publication of the Great Barrington Declaration, Dr. Francis Collins, then director of the National Institutes of Health (NIH), referred to Bhattacharya, along with co-authors Sunetra Gupta and Martin Kulldorff, as “fringe epidemiologists” in an email to Anthony Fauci. This email, which was later revealed through a Freedom of Information Act request, called for a “quick and devastating published takedown” of the declaration’s premises, highlighting the contentious nature of their proposed approach to managing the pandemic. **Involvement in the Great Barrington Declaration:** – Bhattacharya co-authored the Great Barrington Declaration with: – **Sunetra Gupta** from the University of Oxford – **Martin Kulldorff** from Harvard University **Main Points of the Great Barrington Declaration:** 1. **Focused Protection:** Advocated for protecting those most at risk from the virus while allowing others to resume normal life to develop herd immunity naturally. 2. **Critique of Lockdowns:** Highlighted the negative repercussions of lockdown policies on public health, education, and the economy. 3. **Normal Life for the Young:** Advocated for reopening schools and businesses for young, low-risk individuals.
4. **Herd Immunity:** Suggested building immunity through natural infection among low-risk groups while protecting high-risk individuals, though this was controversial and misunderstood in some circles. 5. **Global Support:** Despite controversy, the declaration received thousands of signatures from scientists and medical professionals worldwide. **Appointment as NIH Director:** – In November 2024, President-elect Donald Trump selected Dr. Jay Bhattacharya to be the next director of the National Institutes of Health (NIH), reflecting his critique of federal health responses during the COVID-19 crisis and his push for significant reforms in how health research and policy are conducted.
