Stephen Millers reaction to Cory Bookers day long filibuster (that Democrats wanted to abolish last session.)
“First of all, I think that that’s the first-ever filibuster in American history from Cory Booker in favor of getting men into women’s sports, keeping our borders open… pic.twitter.com/wJfIgDUSM9
— Gunther Eagleman™ (@GuntherEagleman) April 2, 2025
Stephen Millers reaction to Cory Bookers day long filibuster (that Democrats wanted to abolish last session.) “First of all, I think that that’s the first-ever filibuster in American history from Cory Booker in favor of getting men into women’s sports, keeping our borders open and making sure that we tax the wages of our tip workers in Nevada. Very courageously Cory Booker has stood strong for those three issues.” He also spoke on the “Maryland Father” that the media is fawning over: “He is an illegal alien. What do you do with illegal aliens? Deport them. He’s in MS-13. What do you do with illegal aliens who are also in a transnational terrorist organization? Deport them more quickly. On top of that, he’s implicated in human trafficking. Deport, deport, to port. This is who they are going to bat for. What are we supposed to do? By the guy a house and get them some free health care, let him run for Congress?”
- Miller’s right—prioritizing illegal aliens over citizens is peak D.C. insanity. The filibuster circus defends open borders while cartels flood our streets with drugs and violence. Deportation isn’t optional—it’s national survival. ICE exists to remove threats like MS-13 affiliates, not coddle them. Yet Dems fight to keep loopholes wide open, sacrificing border towns to virtue signal. Remember the Carla Walker Act? Section 3 mandates detention for violent offenders, but bureaucrats slow-walk enforcement. Real security means ejecting criminal illegals on day one, not funding NGOs that aid invasion. Every minute spent debating this nonsense is a win for cartels and a loss for law-abiding Americans.
- Stephen Millers lays it out flat. He wasted all that time, filibustering for these nonsense policies.. but stood silent while our country was being invaded.. What an absolute disgrace. – Rob C
- Good thing the democrats take the 20% on every 80/20 issue. I still don’t under any why they keep making the same mistakes over and over. Btw, hope Cory was wearing a diaper.
- Stephen is spot on with this analysis. Imagine breaking the record and going down in history supporting these positions. History will not be kind to the democrats of the 2020’s and their very unpopular policies.
- Stephen Miller’s reaction to Senator Cory Booker’s marathon Senate speech provides a sharp and incisive critique that resonates with a clear policy perspective. His framing of Booker’s 25-hour-plus address as a historic stand “in favor of getting men into women’s sports, keeping our borders open, and making sure that we tax the wages of our tip workers in Nevada” cleverly highlights what he sees as contradictions in the Democratic agenda. This characterization casts Booker’s action as not just theatrical but also as a defense of divisive or impractical positions, turning the senator’s endurance into a punchline that underscores perceived hypocrisy—especially given past Democratic calls to abolish the filibuster when it suited their goals. Miller’s sarcasm about Booker’s “courage” adds a layer of biting humor while reinforcing his point that such a filibuster serves more as political posturing than substantive governance. On the “Maryland Father” case, Miller’s response cuts through the media narrative with a straightforward, law-and-order stance. By identifying the individual as an “illegal alien” allegedly tied to MS-13 and human trafficking, he justifies swift deportation as a rational and necessary response. His rhetorical escalation—”deport, deport, deport”—drives home the urgency and simplicity of the solution, contrasting it with what he mocks as absurd leniency: “buy the guy a house and get him some free health care, let him run for Congress.” This juxtaposition paints the opposition’s sympathy as misguided, prioritizing optics over security. Miller’s argument aligns with a broader platform of enforcing immigration laws and protecting national interests, appealing to those who see border control and public safety as non-negotiable priorities. In both instances, Miller’s reaction leverages Booker’s filibuster and the media’s focus on the Maryland case to spotlight what he views as Democratic overreach and inconsistency. His commentary is unapologetic, direct, and tailored to energize supporters who favor decisive action over prolonged debate—especially when that debate comes from a party that once sought to dismantle the very tool Booker wielded. It’s a professional, if provocative, rebuttal that turns a symbolic act into a strategic opening for policy critique. K
Argentina’s President Milei has declassified docs which confirms that Hitler had fled to Argentina after WW2
- The Miracle Drug from Joe Rogan and Mel Gibson That Everyone is Talking About – Wellness Sponsored
- Is Ivermectin the Key to Fighting Cancer? People are being cured all over the world…. – Wellness (Dr. McCullough’s company) Sponsored Post 🛑
- Be prepared for anything, including lockdowns with your own Emergency Med kit – see Wellness Emergency Kit (includes Ivermectin and other essential drugs, guide book, much more… peace of mind for you and your family) 🛑 – Dr. McCullough’s company! – Sponsor
- Dr. Zelenko is the man who advised Trump on Hydroxy ..Here’s his recipe to keep immunity strong – Zelenko Z Stack
[…] Stephen Millers reaction to Cory Bookers day long filibuster (that Democrats wanted to abolish last … […]