Yes, this is real. They actually admitted America is “a society controlled exclusively by, and for the benefit of the top 1%” “Citigroup wrote 3 confidential memos to their wealthiest investors about how things were going. They reached the conclusion that the United States was no longer really a democracy, but it become a Plutonomy, a society controlled exclusively by, and for the benefit of the top 1% of the population who now have more financial wealth than the bottom 95% combined” “The memo gloated about the growing gap between rich and poor and how they were now the new aristocracy, and that there was no end in sight for the gravy train they were on.”
American Financial Institutions private memos reveals ‘America is no longer a Democracy’
Yes, this is real. They actually admitted America is “a society controlled exclusively by, and for the benefit of the top 1%”
“Citigroup wrote 3 confidential memos to their wealthiest… pic.twitter.com/8qUuq0JyPz
— Wall Street Apes (@WallStreetApes) January 3, 2025
The issue of corruption and manipulation in the U.S. equity markets is indeed a complex and contentious one. Here’s a breakdown of perspectives considering both the potential for change under a new administration with Donald Trump at the helm and the concerns about entrenched interests: Historical Context and Trump’s Policies: Donald Trump’s first term was marked by deregulatory efforts aimed at what he described as “unnecessary regulations” on businesses, including financial markets. His administration’s approach often favored less government oversight, which some argue could lead to increased market manipulation if not carefully balanced with transparency and accountability measures. However, there’s also an argument that reducing regulatory burdens could potentially reduce the avenues for corruption if managed correctly. Perception of Change:
The sentiment on platforms like X suggests skepticism about significant changes in market integrity with Trump’s return. Some posts indicate a belief that Trump might be part of the same system he criticizes, suggesting a continuation of current practices rather than a reform. This skepticism stems from the view that systemic issues in markets are deeply ingrained and influenced by a broad coalition of interests, including those often referred to as the “1%” or “shadow government”. Regulatory Environment: The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) under Trump’s previous administration took steps that could be seen as both pro-market freedom and potentially less protective for investors. For instance, actions were taken to increase transparency in certain market operations but also faced criticism for potentially weakening investor protections.
The new SEC under Trump might continue this trend, focusing more on deregulation, which could either exacerbate or mitigate manipulation depending on how policies are implemented. Market Integrity and the “1%”: Your concern about the influence of the wealthiest segment of society, often referred to as the “1%”, and a so-called “shadow government” is echoed by many who argue that these groups have significant sway over policy and market outcomes. The idea is that regardless of who is in office, the structural advantages these entities possess might prevent significant market “squeezes” or corrections that could disrupt their interests. This perspective posits that any real change would require systemic overhaul rather than administrative shifts alone. Conclusion: Change in market manipulation and corruption could occur, but it would largely depend on the specifics of policy implementation, the extent of regulatory reform, and whether there’s genuine intent to address these issues beyond political rhetoric. The entrenched interests you’re worried about pose a significant barrier, suggesting that while some procedural changes might be enacted, the fundamental dynamics of market manipulation might remain unless there’s a concerted effort to alter the power balance significantly. Thus, while there might be some shifts in policy or rhetoric under Trump’s administration, the deep-seated nature of market manipulation concerns suggests that meaningful change would require more than just a change in leadership. It would need broad societal and legislative support to tackle issues that have persisted across multiple administrations. Tweet
How did they get so sinister? The CIA of course.
Stumbled across a whole bunch of CIA front companies and a whole girl squad of CIA operatives.
And I found it while looking into the board of directors of one of the biggest financial institutions in the USA.
Any guesses which one? 👀 pic.twitter.com/btqfgHVw7M
— Ian Carroll (@IanCarrollShow) February 3, 2024
- We were never supposed to be a democracy in the first place, we were gifted with a republic by the founders who fought and died and sacrificed everything to establish our modern independence AZ Patriot
Selling Us Snake Oil: TOP 10 MEMES – Watch MAGA
- Be prepared for anything, including lockdowns with your own Emergency Med kit – see Wellness Emergency Kit (includes Ivermectin and other essential drugs, guide book, much more… peace of mind for you and your family) 🛑 – Dr. McCullough’s company! – Sponsor
- Dr. Zelenko is the man who advised Trump on Hydroxy ..Here’s his recipe to keep immunity strong – Zelenko Z Stack
Add comment